Marriage Erase Crimes: Supreme Court Made a significant decision
- Legitime Advocates
- May 25, 2024
- 5 min read
In the fast-paced world of today, professionals often find themselves balancing the demands of their careers with the complexities of personal relationships. One topic that has garnered attention and sparked conversations among professionals is the concept that marriage can erase crimes. Let's delve into this intriguing notion and explore its implications in our society.
Unlocking the Power of Redemption
When we think about the phrase "marriage erase crimes," it may initially sound like a sensational headline. However, at its core, this concept speaks to the idea of redemption and transformation. Marriage has long been viewed as a sacred union, capable of bringing out the best in individuals and fostering personal growth. In this light, could marriage truly have the power to erase past mistakes and lead individuals on a path of renewal and redemption?
Perceptions and Realities
While the idea of marriage erasing crimes may seem like a fairy tale, there is a profound truth behind it. Personal insights shared by individuals have revealed that the commitment and emotional support found in a healthy marriage can indeed empower individuals to leave behind their past transgressions and strive for a better future. The journey of building a life together can foster accountability, empathy, and a shared vision that transcends individual shortcomings.
Insights from Site Activity
Through a comprehensive analysis of site activity data, it becomes clear that discussions around marriage and its impact on personal transformation resonate deeply with our audience of professionals. The engagement and interest shown in related content indicate a shared curiosity about the intersection of personal relationships and individual growth. This reaffirms the relevance and timeliness of exploring the concept of marriage in the context of crime and redemption.
Join the Conversation
As we reflect on the profound implications of the idea that marriage can erase crimes, we invite you to share your thoughts and experiences. How do you perceive the role of marriage in personal transformation? Have you witnessed instances where a committed relationship led to significant positive changes in an individual's life? Join us in unraveling the complexities and nuances of this thought-provoking concept.
The Power of Renewal
In conclusion, while the notion of marriage erasing crimes may evoke varying responses, it underscores the transformative potential of human relationships. This editorial aims to spark introspection, dialogue, and a deeper understanding of the ways in which love, commitment, and forgiveness can shape our paths to redemption. Let us embrace the belief in second chances and the unyielding power of renewal that marriage, in its truest form, can offer.
Stay tuned for more insightful content and thought-provoking discussions!
Supreme Court Made a significant decision by quashing the conviction of a man accused of stalking and criminal intimation. The basis of decision was his marriage to complainant during the appeal process.
Dasari Srikanth Vs. State of Telangana
[Criminal Appeal No(s).________ of 2024 arising out of SLP (Criminal) No(s). 2122 of 2024]
Mehta, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal is preferred by the appellant for assailing the judgment dated 27th June, 2023 passed by the High Court of the State of Telangana at Hyderabad partly allowing the Criminal Appeal No.178 of 2021 preferred by the appellant, upholding his conviction for offences under Sections 354D and 506-Part I of the Indian Penal Code, 1860(hereinafter being referred to as the 'IPC'), but reducing the sentence of imprisonment for both the offences to three months.
3. The accused appellant was tried by the Special Fast Track Court, Suryapet(hereinafter being referred to as 'trial Court'). Vide judgment dated 9th April, 2021, the trial Court acquitted the accused appellant for the offences under Section 11 read with Section 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012(hereinafter being referred to as 'POCSO Act') but at the same time, convicted and sentenced him for offences under Sections 354D and 506-Part I IPC as follows:
i) Under Section 354D IPC: Rigorous Imprisonment for 2 years and a fine of Rs. 1000/-(in default to undergo Simple Imprisonment for one month)
ii) Under Section 506 Part I IPC: Simple Imprisonment for 6 months and a fine of Rs. 500/-(in default to undergo Simple Imprisonment for 15 days)
4. As stated above, the High Court reduced the sentences awarded to the accused appellant to three months on both counts. A pertinent plea has been raised in this appeal that the appellant and the complainant(victim) have married each other on 6th August, 2023 as per the Hindu rites and customs and that the marriage has also been registered in the Office of Registrar of Hindu Marriages and Sub Registrar, Kodad, District Suryapet, Telangana. An affidavit of the complainant affirming this fact was placed on record. Accordingly, vide order dated 16th April, 2024, we directed the learned Standing Counsel for the State of Telangana to verify the fact regarding the marriage of the appellant and the complainant from the concerned police station.
5. Ms. Devina Sehgal, learned counsel representing the State has filed a compliance affidavit sworn by the Sub-Inspector of the police station concerned who has verified the fact that the appellant and the complainant have solemnized marriage with each other and the marriage was registered as per the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 at the Office of Registrar and Sub Registrar, Kodad, Suryapet District, Telangana on 23rd, September, 2023. The copy of the marriage certificate is annexed with the said affidavit.
6. As is evident from the record, the appellant was initially charged for the offences under Sections 354D and 506 of IPC and Section 11 read with Section 12 of POCSO Act. However, the learned trial Court did not find the offences under the POCSO Act proved and acquitted the accused appellant from the said charges.
7. The offences under Section 354D IPC and Section 506 IPC are personal to the complainant and the accused appellant. The fact that the appellant and the complainant have married each other during the pendency of this appeal gives rise to a reasonable belief that both were involved in some kind of relationship even when the offences alleged were said to have been committed.
8. Since, the appellant and the complainant have married each other, the affirmation of the judgment rendered by the High Court would have the disastrous consequence on the accused appellant being sent to jail which in turn could put his matrimonial relationship with the complainant in danger.
9. As a consequence, we are inclined to exercise the powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India for quashing the conviction of the accused appellant as recorded by the learned trial Court and modified by the High Court.
10. As a result, the impugned judgment dated 27th June, 2023 passed by the High Court and judgment dated 9th April, 2021 passed by the trial Court are hereby quashed and set aside.
11. The appellant is acquitted of the charges.
12. The appeal is allowed in these terms.
13. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
........................J. (B.R. Gavai)
........................J. (Sandeep Mehta)
New Delhi;
May 15, 2024
This editorial is inspired by the profound insights shared under the theme "Marriage Erase Crimes" and the intriguing dynamics of personal transformation within the context of committed relationships.
Comments